romybeth
07-30-2006, 12:38 AM
We have a situation that we would love feed back on.
When oue son was diagnosed with Micropthalmia, our Opthomologist sent us to a woman occularist who comes to our town, but is based out of state... problem was, she was also out of out insurance network and we were hit severly with medical charges for each visit. We paid for all of our visits ( $75 just to sit down and chat with her each time) and a deposit of $525.... She originally gave us a "stock" conformer, and when she made a new one for him, took the old one back. We are now, 7 months later, getting a bill for $525 AND have had our deposit used.
We have since moved to a different ocularist, since January 2006. He is wonderful, know that woman we used to go to. He makes our son's conformers look like the real deal, and only charges up for a "serise" of them.
We spoke to him about this bill we received and he is of the 'professional opinion' that she is trying to rip us off, as we have 1 conformer, but are being charged for 2, as she took back her 'stock'eye. It has been suggested to us that we write her a letter, along with one to the ASO, expressing that what she is doing seems unfair and unethical, as we all know our babies need many conformers when they are little. What do y'all think??
Id love some feed back, opinions and shared stories. And has anyone found any kind of financial help to pay for all of these conformers in the early years????? Seems insurance doesnt take into consideration how many a baby needs in his/her first years of life.
TIA!
Romy
When oue son was diagnosed with Micropthalmia, our Opthomologist sent us to a woman occularist who comes to our town, but is based out of state... problem was, she was also out of out insurance network and we were hit severly with medical charges for each visit. We paid for all of our visits ( $75 just to sit down and chat with her each time) and a deposit of $525.... She originally gave us a "stock" conformer, and when she made a new one for him, took the old one back. We are now, 7 months later, getting a bill for $525 AND have had our deposit used.
We have since moved to a different ocularist, since January 2006. He is wonderful, know that woman we used to go to. He makes our son's conformers look like the real deal, and only charges up for a "serise" of them.
We spoke to him about this bill we received and he is of the 'professional opinion' that she is trying to rip us off, as we have 1 conformer, but are being charged for 2, as she took back her 'stock'eye. It has been suggested to us that we write her a letter, along with one to the ASO, expressing that what she is doing seems unfair and unethical, as we all know our babies need many conformers when they are little. What do y'all think??
Id love some feed back, opinions and shared stories. And has anyone found any kind of financial help to pay for all of these conformers in the early years????? Seems insurance doesnt take into consideration how many a baby needs in his/her first years of life.
TIA!
Romy